Price Floor for Ride-Hailing Services: a Boon or a Curse for Consumers?

Disruptive innovations developed by ride-hailing companies have transformed the transportation market in Indonesia. Since GoJek was launched in 2010, ride-hailing services have won the hearts of customers, driving them away from conventional taxis.
GoJek, Grab and Uber – sometimes called transportation network companies (TNC) – have developed disruptive technologies, mostly within their mobile apps, that have enhanced productivity.
These innovations allow for shorter waiting time, wider areas of service and – most importantly – cheaper fares.
While these ride-hailing services offer many benefits, their business model has also triggered a long-running conflict between their so-called "driver-partners" and drivers of conventional taxis.
Conventional taxi companies have long accused the government of playing favorites with the ride-hailing companies.
One example of unequal treatment the government meted out was the fact that ride-hailing cars were for a long time not required to undergo the roadworthiness test (KIR), which is mandatory for conventional taxis.
The government later made the test – and a bunch of other requirements – mandatory for ride-hailing cars.
These requirements included using taximeter to calculate fares, applying a sticker on cars used for ride-hailing services and registering the company that owns the cars.
But since then the Supreme Court has ruled that the regulations have become a deterrent for the transportation industry since it prevented consumers from receiving the competitive advantages that ride-hailing technology offers.
One rule that has remained is the government-mandated price floor and price ceiling for ride-hailing services.
The price ceiling is there to prevent ride-hailing companies from charging exorbitant prices during peak hours.
Meanwhile, the price floor is meant to prevent predatory pricing practices that could give ride-hailing companies an unfair advantage over their conventional competitors.
The government is of the opinion that a price floor will prevent conventional taxi companies from being driven completely out of the market by ride-hailing companies with huge capital backing that could sustain losses to keep lowering their fares.
The problem is, there is evidence that a price floor may not necessarily make the market more competitive or benefit customers, and do the exact opposite.
In the United States, the Philadelphia Taxi Association sued Uber for trying to monopolize the market by offering unreasonably cheap prices to shut down its conventional competitors.
But the US Court of Appeals rejected the charge, arguing that companies like Uber actually create more competition rather than destroy it.
The argument against predatory pricing is that once the company dealing it has a monopoly on the market it would use its power to raise prices and hurt the consumers.
But there is also the possibility that new competitors – attracted by the possibility of grabbing that monopoly – would crowd the market, turning it competitive once again.
Also, a company dealing in predatory pricing may not be able to sustain or subsidize losses for too long and will be forced to abandon it sooner rather than later.
Meanwhile, the cheaper fares produced by the competitive pricing might have already benefited the customers.
To date, no company in Indonesia has ever been punished for violating anti-predatory pricing regulations.
There is one scenario when a price floor harms rather than benefits the market: when it prevents the consumers from enjoying the best – aka lowest – prices possible.
In the long run, a price floor could also become a disincentive for businesses since it would eventually lead to a huge supply surplus.
To remedy the surplus, ride-hailing companies would be forced to lay off drivers, thus increasing unemployment.
Intervening by setting up a price floor might also show up the government for being unsupportive of disruptive technologies – and by consequence, the economy.
Imposing a price floor could be an excessive and unnecessary policy that could potentially harm not only transportation companies but also the public.
Kurnia Togar P. Tanjung is a lecturer and researcher at the University of Indonesia's Faculty of Law and an expert staff at the House of Representatives.
Tags: Keywords:Related Articles
Danantara in Talks to Join Grab’s $7B GoTo Deal: Bloomberg
Indonesia’s Danantara may join Grab’s $7B GoTo deal, easing regulatory concerns over foreign control of a national tech giant.Mass Ride-Hailing Strike Set to Paralyze Jakarta, Major Cities on Tuesday
Hundreds of thousands of ride-hailing drivers across Indonesia are set to stage a nationwide protest on Tuesday.Grab Denies $7 Billion Merger Rumor With GoTo
Grab denies $7B merger rumors with GoTo, calling them unverified. The firm reaffirms commitment to Indonesia and local economic growth.Manpower Minister to Meet Gojek, Grab Over Low Eid Bonus Payout
Manpower Minister Yassierli to meet Gojek, Grab over Eid bonus protests as drivers demand fairer payouts.Gov't Calls on Ride-Hailing Companies to Give 20% Eid Bonuses to Top Drivers
Indonesia urges ride-hailing firms to provide Eid bonuses for drivers. Gojek, Grab comply, while Maxim refuses.Ride-Hailing Companies Split on Prabowo’s Eid Bonus Request
Gojek & Grab to give Eid incentives to drivers, while Maxim declines cash payments, citing legal grounds.Prabowo Urges Ride Hailing Companies to Give Drivers Eid Bonuses
Prabowo says that these ride-hailing drivers and couriers have largely contributed to Indonesia's transportation services.Fire Breaks Out at Gojek Office in Pasaraya Blok M, No Casualties Reported
A fire broke out at Gojek's office in Pasaraya Blok M, South Jakarta, allegedly due to an AC blower malfunction.Deputy Minister Joins Protest and Urges Ride-Hailing Firms to Pay Ramadan Bonus to Drivers
He underlined that the bonus should be paid in cash rather than in commodities like rice or sugar.GoTo Denies Merger Talks with Grab for the Second Time
GoTo Gojek Tokopedia denies rumors of a $7 billion merger with Grab, calling it speculative.The Latest
Bezos’ Lavish Venice Wedding Sparks Protests Over Inequality
Jeff Bezos’ Venice wedding sparks protests by locals and activists who say it highlights inequality and tourism-driven displacement.Gov’t Investigates Foreign Site Over Anambas Island Sale
Indonesia investigates a foreign website that listed four Anambas islands for sale, raising alarm over sovereignty and legal violations.Prabowo Already Has His US Envoy Candidate, Aide Claims
Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, a close aide to Prabowo Subianto, refuses to reveal the name of the US envoy candidate.Fatal Accidents Reveal the Perils Behind Mount Rinjani’s Beauty
A Brazilian climber is the latest victim on Mount Rinjani, as a string of fatal falls reminds tourists of the mountain’s hidden dangers.75 Men Arrested in Gay Party Raid, 30 Test Positive for HIV/Syphilis
Test results showed that 30 of the 75 party participants were exposed to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and syphilis infection.Most Popular
